DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BO Gent pei ewe eye Sy pep tT ype ae
DOA Sr vette tly DF WAAL PUP
701 ยง COURTHOUSE ROAD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NR05266-13
22 November 2013
This is in reference to your recent request for reconsideration to your
original application which was denied in 1999. In your recent request,
you have submitted additional information for the Board's review on
22 November 2013. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps
(HOMC) memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 of 16 Jul 2013, a copy of which is being
provided to you.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the additional evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In making this determination, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence cf probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
WwW. Na Teka
Executive M tar
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3475 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY mean Ben ome. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5899 13
In June 2013, your husband sought 2 correction to his naval record to show that he enrolled his spouse, Ey -: the sole beneficiary of SBP within one year of his marriage. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6936 13
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased husband's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2475 13
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, In addition, the Board considered the regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7136 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6908 13
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 November 2013. In addition, the Board ry opinion furnished by the Survivor Benefit Plan lty Assistance (PERS-13) of 30 Sept 2013, a copy of which has already been provided to you. Consequently, when tion of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4871 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6112 13
BA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR105 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official | naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8890 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your case on 9 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.